Published on

Static Sites Suck for Interactivity (So I Added JSX)

Static Sites Suck for Interactivity (So I Added JSX)

I love static sites. They're fast, secure, and perfect for content that doesn't change often. But they have one major limitation: interactivity. When I wanted to add interactive elements to my blog posts, I had to get creative.

The Problem

Traditional static sites are great for:

  • Fast page loads
  • SEO optimization
  • Low hosting costs
  • Security (no server-side code)

But they fall short when you want to:

  • Add interactive components
  • Create dynamic user experiences
  • Build engaging content that responds to user input
  • Track user interactions

The Solution: A Hybrid Approach

I decided to build a hybrid blog that combines the best of both worlds:

  1. Static content for the main blog post
  2. Interactive React components for engaging elements

How It Works

// Example of how components are integrated into MDX
import { DopamineTracker } from '@/components/interactive/dopamine/DopamineTracker'

# My Blog Post

Here's some static content...

<DopamineTracker />

More static content...

The key to this approach is using MDX (Markdown + JSX) with Next.js. This allows me to:

  • Write content in Markdown for better readability
  • Import and use React components directly in the content
  • Keep the static generation benefits while adding interactivity

The Benefits

  1. Best of Both Worlds

    • Static content for performance
    • Interactive elements for engagement
    • No compromise on either front
  2. Developer Experience

    • Write content in familiar Markdown
    • Use React components when needed
    • TypeScript support for type safety
  3. User Experience

    • Fast initial page load
    • Progressive enhancement
    • Rich interactive features

Implementation Details

The setup involves several key pieces:

  1. MDX Configuration

    • Next.js MDX support
    • Custom components mapping
    • TypeScript integration
  2. Component Architecture

    • Client-side components for interactivity
    • Server components for static content
    • Proper hydration handling
  3. State Management

    • Local storage for persistence
    • React state for interactivity
    • Clean separation of concerns

Example: The Dopamine Tracker

Let's look at a real example from my blog. The Dopamine Tracker is an interactive component that helps readers understand their digital habits:

Track Your Dopamine Triggers

Ready to understand your digital habits? Start tracking your dopamine triggers for the next 24 hours.

This component:

  • Tracks dopamine triggers in real-time
  • Persists data in local storage
  • Provides insights about digital habits
  • Works seamlessly within the static content

The Future of Blogging

I believe this hybrid approach represents the future of blogging. Instead of choosing between static sites and full-blown web applications, we can have both:

  • Static content for better performance and SEO
  • Interactive elements for better engagement
  • Progressive enhancement for better user experience

Conclusion

Static sites don't have to be boring. By adding JSX and React components, we can create engaging, interactive content while maintaining the benefits of static generation. The result is a blog that's both performant and engaging.

Try it yourself! The code is open source, and you can find the implementation details in my GitHub repository.

Resources


What do you think about this hybrid approach? Have you tried something similar? Let me know in the comments below!